The data analysis will be conducted to analyse the data. For
the interview data, online discussion board content and responses via email,
they will be recorded, transcribed in the form of verbatim, the codes will be
identified and the themes will be generated. Finally, the data will be analysed
and reported using the quotes from the respondents’ responses, views and
answers.
3.5.1 Reliability
In this study, the reliability of the interview taken is
proved by the consistency of the responses given by the lecturer. From the
interview, the reliability will be stronger as the responses and views are
backed up by comments that the lecturers made in the interview and in the
online discussion board. A high degree of consistency or stability indicates a
high degree of reliability, which means the results are quite similar or repeatable.
3.5.2 Validity
Validity determines whether the study truly measures that
which it was intended to measure or how truthful the research results are. To
measure the validity of the instrument, the questions for the interview will be
validated by an expert from a local public university with a vast knowledge and
experience in conducting research. The internal validity is measured whereby
the researcher refrained from being bias and prejudice towards the respondents’
responses. The trustworthiness of the study is obtained by the use of member
checking and prolonged engagement. Researcher will share the finding gained
from the respondents’ perception with the others who are expert in this area of
study to discuss the results given. The data will be transcribed. At this point
of data analysing, member checking is needed to check whether trustworthiness
is found in the result. This approach is significant as it is used to
established trustworthiness thus managing the treats of bias in the result.